media seo analytics | push2digital

Thoughts, examples, questions on how digital media can be better  

What Should Be In Your Top 300 Pixels?

Most "how-to improve web page performance" research is typically geared towards marketers and e-commerce applications, but it doesn't mean media types can't take valuable lessons from those insights and in fact some are doing just that.
Take for example a recent Omniture white paper on Best Practices for Conversion:
The New Engagement Funnel in 7 Steps includes a section on organizing your page and site structure. The key takeaways are:
  • Is your page clean, clear and visually appealing?
  • Does it load in less than 8 seconds?
  • Is your primary focus of the page fixed [not rotating]?
  • Are your critical calls to action in the upper 300 pixels of the page?
  • Does your pane view [visible page without scrolling] contain your most important content?
Then take a look at CNN and NYTimes story pages and they answer yes on all accounts. In addition, see their top 300 to 400 pixels? What calls to action do these content marketers (aka media outlets) push? Apart from a dominant ad position that pays the bills, these story pages target engagement around sharing and capturing user data via social login. This tells me that a user republishing their story or identifying themselves via social login are the homerun actions they're looking for.

(download)

Filed under  //   Best Practice   SEOmoz   calls to action   cnn   engagement   media   nytimes.com   omniture   seo  


Get Push2Digital's SEO, Analytics tips via e-mail | Thanks, but I prefer RSS

Comments [0]

Search Driving More Traffic To Your Site

Search-driving-more-traffic-in

When evaluating the general health of your site, one of the first areas to review is your acquisition strategy ... to understand how people are arriving at your front-door?

I use the term "people" rather than "user", "customer" or "visitor", because it's important to remember these are more than referral stats -- they're warm, breathing humans that choose to visit your site. And they generally fall into three groups:

  • People who know you -- (direct traffic)
  • People who were recommended to you or your content -- (referral traffic)
  • People who searched for you or your content -- (search traffic) 

You could add other categories for people driven by ad campaigns or e-mail marketing -- but the above three are the biggies, especially for media sites.

Now, according to a KissMetrics post, which is based on Google Analytics data, of those three acquisition sources, search continues to grow. As the choices and access points for content evolve and expand -- search remains the quickest, simplest way to navigate most information inquiries on the web and is your best means to introduce yourself to new "people".

The 2011 Web Analytics Review infographic also notes an overall drop in Pages per Visit, Time on Site and Referrals from other sites. As people's attention continues to splinter and referrals from other sources drop, search becomes an even more attractive option to reach folks short on time, but hungry for information.

 

Filed under  //   acquisition   analytics   google analytics   infographic   kissmetrics   media   referrals   seo  


Get Push2Digital's SEO, Analytics tips via e-mail | Thanks, but I prefer RSS

Comments [0]

Why Is The Web Blue? #media #design

Web-most-preferred-colors

Ever wonder why so many websites are blue? Well, Kissmetrics has a swell infographic that layouts out color preferences that explain "Why the web is blue" as well as men's and women's most hated color. Here's a hint ... Univ. of Texas fans would disagree.  



Get Push2Digital's SEO, Analytics tips via e-mail | Thanks, but I prefer RSS

Comments [0]

What Does Local News' Second Screen Have To Say? #media

Tv-plus

When you hear broadcasters and vendors buzz about the promise of second-screen apps -- what exactly are we talking about when it comes to local news?

Take for example TVPlus, it won the “Best New Idea” award at the Social TV Summit. The gist is based on a user a with a connected device who is watching TV. The app (iPad only for now) identifies the show you're watching via audio signals, synchs (yup, I'm watching "Sunday Night Football | Giants-Eagles") and serves up related content via scrolling snippets that include Twitter, Facebook and other content.

Technically it works great -- it's impressive in fact, if not slightly creepy, that it can ID the show I'm watching consistently. But what their offering me is less than compelling. The content links to related YouTube clips, Wikipedia definitions, actor/player profiles and facts and information that is basically a duplication of an updated topical Google search. 

The promise and impact of the second-screen is there -- but the question is ... once I get over the fact that I have an iPad (yeah) and there's an app that sees my TV (neat) -- it comes back to the related content. Will it keep me coming back? Once the app's in place, who and how will you execute on the mission to make it worth visiting. 

The answer's in the content.

Lost Remote reported that 10 broadcast groups recently inked a deal with ConnecTV including Gannett, Hearst, Belo, Scripps, Cox, Media General, Meredith, Post-Newsweek, Raycom and Barrington to build second-screen apps for their local news products and ... here's the rub ... "ConnecTV says it will provide synchronized content and conversation across all programming genres, live or on-demand."

Providing the app and technology is great. Providing content that will be worthy of repeat visits and a business model is a much tougher claim. Second-screen apps for local news programs will not benefit from the motivated entertainment experience that NFL Football and "Glee" enjoy. In addition, it will be promoted on-air to an older less tablet/app savvy audience. 

The hope is that second-screen will pull in younger demos to engage with your news brand, but it will live or die based on the content. 

ConnecTV will be challenged to provide compelling interactive local news-related content for the second screen. To be executed properly that charge must fall to the local news teams. The opportunity is for this second-screen to be part of the on-air display with content that's worthy of standing alone, accepting and responding to viewer questions live during the newscast, adding unique and unduplicated content in the app stream.

Auto-generated content from ConnectTV, even with Twitter, Facebook feeds will not be enough. This is a good start and a step in the right direction, but the plan hinges on the next step, which requires smart digital content creation and web experience management to generate audiences that will in turn generate revenue.



Get Push2Digital's SEO, Analytics tips via e-mail | Thanks, but I prefer RSS

Comments [0]

How Do I Get My Visitors To ...

Bj-fogg-behavior-wizard

Changing behavior is one the most challenging missions a digital media team can tackle and yet it's the key component to digital businesses. In most cases we want the user to perform some action for the first time or more often such as -- buy our book, read our stories, like our Facebook page, share our video clip, register for our e-mail newsletter or share information about themselves.

If you have not heard of BJ Fogg's Behavior Model, you should check it out, it's super guidance for anyone designing digital destinations.If you're lazy like me and just want the answers quick, try this Behavior Wizard that allows you to gameplan for the specific type of behavior change you're targeting.

[One of the links above uses a Fogg Behavior Model strategy ... if you can guess it, leave me a comment.]

Filed under  //   BJ Fogg   Behavior Model   conversions   media  


Get Push2Digital's SEO, Analytics tips via e-mail | Thanks, but I prefer RSS

Comments [0]

Wait ... Social Can Drive My TV Ratings?

Tv-viewers

 

Want to capture the attention of your news director or GM? Try closing the loop on your social media efforts with a reference to higherTV Ratings.

[Scene: GM crosses newsroom, digital director trails speaking with elaborate hand gestures. GM stops, head tilted, one eye squinting, ‘Huh? … Wait what did you say?]

That’s right, according to a Nielsen study, (see full report Nielsen -- Social Buzz Impacts TV Ratings) social buzz generated about a TV program shows some moderate correlation to TV ratings. Lost Remote quotes Facebook’s Andy Mitchell, that he’s “pretty confident” a recent USA Network promotion linked to “Psych’s” Facebook helped drive a 10% ratings increase.

The Nielsen study asserts the same stating that increases in what they define as “social buzz” -- a formula based on social mentions, # of authors and other factors – generates ratings increases on a scale as strong as 9 to 1 [9% increase in buzz correlates to 1% increase in ratings for certain demographics].

It’s not a silver bullet, but the framework for proof that social media’s impact on the broadcast partner is emerging.

Filed under  //   Andy Mitchell   Psych   TV ratings   USA Network   analytics   facebook   lost remote   media   nielsen  


Get Push2Digital's SEO, Analytics tips via e-mail | Thanks, but I prefer RSS

Comments [0]

What Is The Best Day to Publish Content?

Facebook_sharing_by_day_of_wee

It's a good question, "What is the best day to publish content?"

It depends on your content, target audience and approach ... basically your digital strategy [if you don't have one, check out this post on building a web measurement model].

WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING FOR?

Let's assume you're a media site that generates 20% to 30% of your traffic from search and another 10% to 20% from social. That's a pretty good chunk of your audience acquisition that depends on others (ie. Google, Facebook, Twitter etc.)

So what if you could obtain greater exposure by analyzing what days generate the most referrals? Good start huh, because if you average 50 FB referrals on Mon., 62 on Tue., 64 on Wed., 48 on Thu., 52 on Fri, 22 on Sat. and 18 on Sun. -- that tells you something right?

It does, but not entirely.

To get a clear picture, you have to factor in how many pieces of content you're pushing out on those days. If you're publishing 95 stories on weekdays and 32 stories on weekends, that's significant. Therefore you want to know the referrals-per-story.

WHERE’S THE OPPORTUNITY?

Dan Zarella published a study on the ideal time to submit blog posts that states the ideal Twitter retweet sweet spot is Friday @ 4p ET.  He also claims that Facebook sharing is highest @ 9a ET and spikes significantly on Saturday.

This confirms data I've seen that stories published on Saturday generate approximately 60% more Facebook and Google referrals per story than those published during the week. Sunday stories show @ 25% more Facebook and 40% more Google referrals per story. The problem is that these spikes are often masked by the total number of referrals which are typically lower on the weekends.

HOW TO MEASURE REFERRALS PER STORY?

Your results may vary, so you should review your own metrics and build this formula. The trick is to compile total number of stories published for the year and break them down by day. In Excel you can apply a formula =WEEKDAY(A1) [A1 is your first date] to convert that date to a simple day of the week. Then you can apply a filter by clicking the header of the Day of the Week column you just created, click Data Tab and Filter button. That will allow to group your yearly data by all the Mondays, Tuesdays, etc. If that sounds confusing, read this post on using Excel's WEEKDAY function.

Once you have the year's stories published and referrals broken down by day of the week, you can build your weekday referral rate. Repeat for each day, and repeat for each source (Google, Twitter, Facebook or any other key referral source.)

(Monday Facebook Referrals / Monday Stories Published = [Monday Facebook referrals per story])

OPPORTUNITY FOR ACTION

The takeaway here is not, "don't publish on weekdays", but that there is a greater opportunity to be shared and ranked on the weekends, Saturday in particular. And content published that is geared towards a Facebook morning audience or Google topics could do significantly better during this time frame. It’s not a simple task, but it’s not rocket science either and worth the time, especially if you can generate more audience with no real extra work – just a smarter choice of publish times and content topics.

Filed under  //   Twitter   analytics   bing   content strategy   excel   facebook   google   media   referrals   seo   strategy   web measurement model  


Get Push2Digital's SEO, Analytics tips via e-mail | Thanks, but I prefer RSS

Comments [0]

comScore's Got It Wrong ... Fix It!

Apple-watermelon-nerds

Apples and watermelons may be a good combination for Nerds, but terrible for analytics.

If you're in digital media measurement, you've probably heard this from your boss, "ComScore's got it wrong, our site has twice as many uniques. Have them fix it!"

Well, he/she is right; you probably do have twice as many. But guess what … in the end, it doesn't really matter [I'll explain why later], but first let's explain why they're different.

My favorite analytics guru Avinash Kaushik recently listed 7 common analytics mistakes and first on the list was ... "Never Compare Apples to Watermelons."

And one of the most common "Apples to Watermelons" examples I can think of happens in media measurement -- comparing internal metrics (Omniture, Web Trends, Google Analytics) to external metrics (comScore, NielsenNet, Compete).

There are 2 main reasons why this is a fruitless task ... let me count them.

1. Differences in the data source -- Most metric measurements are based off a specific data set. Typically it's the data the vendor or company has access to, has purchased or has built. Different sources will generate different results. Internal metrics generally rely on a javascript beacon that passes information. External sources don't have permission to drop a beacon on your pages, so they often use panel-based methods (large panels like Compete, or smaller targeted panels such as comScore).

Internal metrics depend on users' computers to accept cookies and run javascript. External metrics depend on mathematicians to extrapolate what 1 million people in a DMA do based off the actions of 200 monitored panelists.

2. Differences in the definitions -- a pageview is a pageview right? Well yeah, but what about reloaded pages, what about pages viewed by people not represented in panels, what about pageviews viewed from a mobile device? You can see how each source defines their metric by what they have the ability to count or estimate.

Great, then what's the solution?

Well, first is a discussion with your boss to help him/her understand that his competitors deal with the same 40% to 60% comScore metric discount that you do.

Second, measure yourself versus the competition based on same external metric source -- so that you're measuring "apples to apples". Then identify exactly how they compute their measurements and ensure your site is registered with all means possible. Adding tags to your site pages can aid a company like comScore or Quantcast in measuring your audience more accurately.

Third, measure your individual site performance based on the more detailed internal metrics. Focus on relative metrics like percentage growth, month-to-month and year-over-year. Focusing on magic number milestones can obscure recognition of true progress and serious problems.

As with most problems, there’s no black-and-white answer – but understanding the core issue is half the battle enroute to a more actionable strategy.

Filed under  //   analytics   avinash kaushik   comscore   google analytics   media   nielsennet   omniture   quantcast   webtrends  


Get Push2Digital's SEO, Analytics tips via e-mail | Thanks, but I prefer RSS

Comments [0]

Sweet Visual Maps of 8 Digital Markets

Display-ad-tech-landscape

Are you tired of data visualizations yet?

Good, because here are 8 maps that bring some clarity to the crazy complex markets of display, video, search, mobile, social, e-commerce, funding and more.

They’re not pretty, but they’re pretty darn good. [Thanks LumaPartners.]

 

 

Filed under  //   analytics   data visualization   digital markets   display   e-commerce   funding   luma partners   mobile   social media marketing   video  


Get Push2Digital's SEO, Analytics tips via e-mail | Thanks, but I prefer RSS

Comments [0]

Google Draws From Greatest Statistical Graph of All-Time

Napoleon_march_on_moscow

Analytics is about taking action. But if you don’t understand what the data is telling you, you can’t do much with it. 

That’s why data visualization is white hot in the rush to manage big data. In response, Google will be releasing flow visualization as a new feature in Google Analytics over the coming weeks. 

Google referenced what is considered by some to be the greatest statistical graph of all-time – a visualization that charts Napoleon's 1812 invasion of Russia, a campaign that had a casualty rate of 97.7% -- as the inspiration for the new feature.

Google hopes to brings this type of visual clarity to the fire hose of data it collects about your sites.

[Disclaimer: Your casualty rates may differ].  

Filed under  //   analytics   data visualization   flow visualization   google analytics   media   napoleon  


Get Push2Digital's SEO, Analytics tips via e-mail | Thanks, but I prefer RSS

Comments [0]